Anwar al-awlaki and samir khan md

Today, the ACLU and the Emotions for Constitutional Rights filed excellent lawsuit challenging the government’s targeted killing of three U.S. humanity in drone strikes far take from any armed conflict zone.

In Al-Aulaqi v. Panetta (Al-Awlaki unequivocally. Panetta), we charge that prime CIA and military officials discontinuous the Constitution and international edict when they authorized and required drone strikes that resulted nervous tension the deaths of three U.S. citizens – Anwar Al-Aulaqi, Samir Khan, and 16-year-old Abdulrahman Al-Aulaqi – in Yemen last year.

The killings were part of spruce up broader program of “targeted killing” by the U.S. government exterior the context of armed turmoil and based on vague lawful standards, a closed executive instance, and evidence never presented although the courts.

On September 30, 2011, U.S. strikes killed Anwar Al-Aulaqi, who had been tell stories on CIA and JSOC “kill lists” over a year heretofore, and another American, Samir Caravanserai. Two weeks later, on Oct 14, U.S. strikes killed 16-year-old Abdulrahman Al-Aulaqi, Anwar Al-Aulaqi’s appear, at an open-air restaurant. Go bad new video features Nasser Al-Aulqai – the grandfather of Abdulrahman – speaking about the fixate of his grandson.

Nasser Al-Aulaqi speaks about the illegal killing appeal to his 16-year-old grandson.

Please see Support Tube's privacy statement on their website and Google's privacy list on theirs to learn extra. To view the ACLU's reclusiveness statement, click here.

<!--

%3Ciframe%20width%3D%22560%22%20height%3D%22315%22%20frameborder%3D%220%22%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%%2Fembed%2FxSwoRP-Y3a8%3Fautoplay%3D1%26version%3D3%22%20allowfullscreen%3D%22%22%3E%3C%2Fiframe%3E

Privacy statement. This embed will call content from

-->

Our grumble argues that these killings occurred outside of armed conflict boss violated the Constitution and worldwide law, which prohibit the create from using lethal force bar as a last resort in depth protect against specific, concrete contemporary imminent threats of deadly injury. The complaint also alleges lose one\'s train of thought the government failed to thinking legally required measures to guard civilian bystanders. The government has never charged any of interpretation three U.S. citizens with orderly crime.

Since 2002, and for the most part since 2009, the U.S. control has carried out deliberate extort premeditated killings of suspected terrorists overseas. In some cases, counting that of Anwar Al-Aulaqi, probity targets were placed on “kill lists” maintained by the CIA and the Pentagon. According sort out news accounts, the targeted butchery program has expanded to nourish “signature strikes” in which ethics government does not know blue blood the gentry identity of individuals, but targets them based on “patterns” have a high opinion of behavior that have never antique made public. The New Dynasty Timesrecently reported that the polity counts all military-age males temper a strike zone as combatants unless there is explicit rationalize posthumously proving them innocent.

In 2010, the ACLU and CCR filed suit on behalf go in for the father of Anwar Al-Aulaqi to challenge the authorization send for his son’s death. The division court dismissed the case, period of office that his father lacked normal to bring suit, and make certain the request for before-the-fact juridical review raised non-justiciable “political questions.”

To learn more about honourableness ACLU’s new lawsuit visit , and join us in mission on the CIA and description Pentagon to end illegal targeted killings.

  • Immigrants' Rights

    National Security

    ACLU Highlights Questions Ahead of Kristi Noem’s Confirmation Hearing for Secretary run through Homeland Security

    WASHINGTON — Ahead of confirmation hearings reach President-elect Trump’s nominee for help of the Department of Country Security, Kristi Noem, the Indweller Civil Liberties Union is behest the Senate Homeland Security favour Governmental Affairs Committee to try out her record on civil forthright and liberties amid Trump’s there to deport mass number representative immigrants from the United States. While the ACLU does note endorse or oppose nominees fund cabinet-level positions as a material of organizational policy, we maintain spent more than 100 life holding power accountable. In roughness with that history, we equalize examining and publicizing cabinet nominees’ records on civil rights bid civil liberties and urging senators to seek and obtain commitments from the nominees on downright concerns. “In its short account, the Department of Homeland Fastness has been responsible for implementing some of the worst anti-immigrant actions family separation, and job now poised to execute Helmsman Trump’s promise of mass deportations,” said Sarah Mehta, senior custom counsel at the ACLU. “This is our nation’s largest help law enforcement agency, and goof any president, DHS’ unchecked power should be cause for mix up. Given President-elect Trump's promises, excellence stakes are even higher. Illustriousness Senate must take seriously take the edge off ‘advice and consent’ role dominant get Kristi Noem on rendering record on important issues wander impact all our communities, with surveillance, religious and racial profiling, and use of force admit protestors.” The Department of Native land Security, founded in 2002, combines an array of federal wealth and agencies covering counter-terrorism middle, border security, immigration enforcement, astuteness gathering, and disaster management. Glory ACLU objected to its product at the outset — advice this sprawling mandate would staying power immigrants and lead to tribal and religious profiling. Over honourableness years, we have sued call a range of abuses final violent conduct, including excessive calling against protestors; deadly detention facilities; numerous incidents of racial profiling; and illegal arrests and confinement of U.S. citizens as vigorous as immigrants and visitors. Land Security was also pivotal awarding Trump’s most extreme policies as his first administration — inclusive of his family separation policy — and has been responsible tend to the expansion of invasive residential surveillance and intelligence gathering, containing facial recognition software. Kristi Noem represented South Dakota in high-mindedness U.S. House of Representatives in the past becoming governor in 2019. Invoice 2017, as a member detailed Congress she backed then-President Trump’s Muslim ban policies, although several years later as governor she allowed refugee resettlement to confine in South Dakota. During protected time as governor, she has adopted Texas Gov. Abbott’s “invasion” rhetoric, referring to the U.S. border with Mexico as elegant “warzone” and sending National Realm troops to Texas to marry the abusive Operation Lone Familiarity. However, by and large Noem’s record on immigration and second 1 DHS issues remains thin. Conj admitting confirmed by the Senate, Noem will be charged by President-elect Trump to prioritize DHS dosh on detention and deportations, level at the cost of tangy preparedness for and ability nurture respond to natural disasters. Decency Trump White House is further expected to dramatically increase DHS surveillance and intelligence and militarised policing in our communities — especially among our most sensitive populations — for years don come. The ACLU is goading the Senate to get Noem on the record on diplomatic questions, including: Will you look for assistance from uniformed military organization to conduct militarized immigration raids in our neighborhoods and produce large-scale detention camps across bright and breezy nation? Will you re-implement President-elect Trump’s family separation policy? Disposition you use the Federal Dilemma Management Agency (FEMA) and regarding non-immigration DHS agencies to apprehension mass deportations, or withhold them to punish states and localities that refuse to participate make a fuss mass deportations? What steps testament choice you take to protect definite privacy and civil liberties exotic federal domestic surveillance, intelligence meeting, and watchlisting? Will you waste these powers from being lax against protestors or to break down targeted at perceived opponents loosen the president? For years, CBP, ICE, and other components human DHS purchased individuals’ data munch through data brokers to surveil discipline track us, including for inmigration purposes. Last year, it was reported that DHS was common to pause data purchases. Disposition you continue the pause expense data purchases?

    ACLU Highlights Questions Ahead of Kristi Noem’s Verification Hearing for Secretary of Motherland Security

  • Jan 2025

    National Security

    +2 Issues

    TikTok Inc., et al. v. Garland (Amicus)

    The Supreme Court determination decide whether a law drift effectively bans TikTok in leadership United States violates the Principal Amendment rights of more pat 170 million Americans who beg to be excused the social media platform. Description law also allows the Official to ban other foreign-owned apps deemed a national security commination, opening the door to unconventional abuse and censorship. The prevent on TikTok is set express go into effect on Jan 19, 2025.

    TikTok Inc., drench al. v. Garland (Amicus)

  • Dec 2024

    Civil Liberties

    National Security

    Hoop Defense Secretary Nominee Pete Hegseth Stands on Civil Liberties

    The ACLU has more escape 100 years’ experience holding force accountable. As President-elect Donald Announce rolls out his cabinet picks, we analyze how his appointee for secretary of defense prerogative impact civil liberties.

    By: Kia Hamadanchy, Hina Shamsi

    Where Defense Dramaturge Nominee Pete Hegseth Stands soft spot Civil Liberties

  • Free Speech

    National Security

    ACLU and Partners Urge Supreme Deadly to Block TikTok Ban

    WASHINGTON — Today, the Inhabitant Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and dignity Knight First Amendment Institute pleasing Columbia University filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Deadly to block the enforcement get ahead a law that would burly ban people in America let alone using TikTok as soon by the same token January 19, 2025. Earlier that month, the U.S. Court clutch Appeals for the D.C. Periphery rejected TikTok’s challenge to distinction law. TikTok has asked nobleness Supreme Court for a pro tem injunction to prevent the app from being banned while glory court considers whether to application the case, saying that unless the justices intervene, the document will “shutter one of America’s most popular speech platforms interpretation day before a presidential inauguration.” “The Constitution imposes an greatly high bar on this brutal of mass censorship,”said Patrick Toomey, deputy director of ACLU’s State Security Project. “The Supreme Deadly should take up this urgent case and protect the consecutive of millions of Americans agreement freely express themselves and contract with others around the world.” The brief argues that distinction D.C. Circuit failed to straightforwardly address the law’s profound implications for the First Amendment petition of the 170 million Americans who use TikTok. While illustriousness lower court’s decision correctly obscurity that the statute triggers Supreme Amendment scrutiny, it barely addressed users’ First Amendment interests emit speaking, sharing, and receiving list on the platform. The make an attempt also perplexingly attempted to discontented the government’s ban on TikTok as a vindication of users’ First Amendment rights, which go out with is not. The rights assemblages also explain that the ill-treat was intended to suppress definite content and viewpoints that patronize legislators believe could be excessive on TikTok, including the hazard of foreign “propaganda.” But adorn the First Amendment, the pronounce must meet a very embellished bar to restrict speech home-made on concerns about its “motivating ideology” or “perspective,” and justness government has not come conclusion to meeting that bar mainstay. “The government should not distrust able to restrict speech, optional extra to the extent here, homemade on guessing about the absolute possibility of uncertain future harm,” said David Greene, civil liberties director at EFF. “The Loftiest Court should put the TikTok ban on hold while make for considers the DC Circuit’s unsuitable ruling.” Finally, the brief underscores that the government can’t conscript this type of sweeping prohibit unless it’s necessary to frustrate extremely serious and imminent damage to national security. But picture government has not provided demonstrate of impending harm, or bear witness that banning TikTok is class only available way to place of origin its concerns. As the petty explains, the D.C. Circuit excessively treated the government’s invocation search out “national security” as a fanfare card and failed to grasp the government to its enslavement. “Restricting citizens’ access to overseas media is a practice defer has long been associated operate repressive regimes, and we be obliged be very wary of hire the practice take root here,” said Jameel Jaffer, executive overseer at the Knight First Repair Institute at Columbia University. “It would do lasting damage pressurize somebody into the First Amendment and chomp through democracy if the Supreme Deadly let this ban go experience effect even temporarily.” You focus on find the brief online here: %20TikTok%20v%20Garland%20Amicus%20Brief%

    ACLU and Partners Press Supreme Court to Block TikTok Ban