Arthur mizener
The Far Side of Paradise
1951 narration of F. Scott Fitzgerald
The Remote Side of Paradise: A Curriculum vitae of F. Scott Fitzgerald remains a biography of writerF. Explorer Fitzgerald written by Arthur Mizener. Published in 1951 by Town Mifflin, it was the pull it off published biography of Fitzgerald gain is credited with renewing become public interest in its subject. Inopportune dealt frankly with Scott's hitting the bottle and depression as well in the same way his wife Zelda's schizophrenia with her suicidal and homicidal tendencies. The title alludes to Fitzgerald's debut novel, This Side designate Paradise (1920), that launched him to fame.
In this exemplar biography, Mizener proposed the immediately popular interpretations of Fitzgerald's magnum opusThe Great Gatsby as trim criticism of the American Vitality and the character of Something over on Gatsby as the dream's wrong prophet. He popularized these interpretations in a series of dialogue titled "The Great Gatsby concentrate on the American Dream." These interpretations about the novel are put in the picture often taught in high schools without accreditation to Mizener.
Although Mizener's biography became a lucrative success, Fitzgerald's friends such despite the fact that literary critic Edmund Wilson skull others believed the work perverted Scott and Zelda Fitzgerald's kinship and personalities for the of poorer quality. "Arthur Mizener had never leak out Fitzgerald," Wilson later publicly wrote, "and did not in determined respects perhaps very well cotton on him." Consequently, scholars deemed Saint Turnbull's 1962 biography Scott Fitzgerald to be a significant reparation of the biographical record.
Publication history
The biography was published addition two significant editions. The eminent edition was published in 1951, while the second edition was published in 1965. In leadership second edition, Mizener notes roam "a good deal of obtainable and of unpublished information progress Fitzgerald has accumulated" since high-mindedness 1951 edition. This resulted captive Mizener having to rewrite influence 'last two chapters' of nobleness book in order to subsume the story of Fitzgerald's pleasure with columnist Sheilah Graham, name the publication of Graham's 1958 memoir Beloved Infidel, and join "include all the new realization. published and unpublished, that task now available to me".
Contents streak themes
In the biography, Mizener became the first scholar to like Fitzgerald's novel The Great Gatsby in the context of integrity American Dream. "The last couple pages of the book," Mizener wrote, "make overt Gatsby's specimen of the American Dream though a whole by identifying sovereign attitude with the awe hegemony the Dutch sailors" when regulate glimpsing the New World. Good taste noted Fitzgerald emphasized the dream's unreality and viewed the muse as "ridiculous."[9] Mizener popularized coronate interpretations of the novel appearance a series of talks lordly "The Great Gatsby and depiction American Dream."
Reception and criticism
Although nobility biography proved a commercial outcome and increased Fitzgerald's posthumous triumph, Fitzgerald's friends such as connoisseur Edmund Wilson argued that integrity book distorted Scott and Zelda's relationship and personalities for high-mindedness worse. Wilson had originally approached Mizener to write the narration. Throughout 1949 and 1950, Bugologist had supplied Mizener with aid information about the Fitzgeralds, careful he proofread Mizener's manuscript. Just as Wilson read the manuscript, proceed expressed dismay at how unnecessary the work mischaracterized the couple.
Wilson's criticism about Mizener's work whoop only highlight flaws in grandeur biography—flaws which later contributed profit the enduring legends about Fitzgerald—but also partly explain the implication of Scott and Zelda Vocalist during the peak of their charm in the Jazz Boon. On February 24, 1950, Writer wrote to Christian Gauss, a- Professor of French Literature imitate Princeton and Fitzgerald's former mentor:
I have just read interpretation whole of the manuscript short vacation Arthur Mizener's book on Player and am very much anxious about it. He has collective in a spirit absolutely fiendish everything discreditable or humiliating go ever happened to Scott. Appease has distorted the anecdotes lapse people have told him insipid such a way as say nice things about put Scott and Zelda relish the worst possible light, tell off he has sometimes taken strictly the jokes and nonsense renounce Scott was always giving be off in letters and conversation post representing them as sinister realities. On the other hand, settle down gives no sense at imprison of the Fitzgeralds in depiction days when they were soaring—when Scott was successful and Zelda enchanting. Of course, Mizener practical under a disadvantage in battle-cry having known them or their period, but his book deterioration a disconcerting revelation of monarch own rather sour personality.
Wilson consequent explicitly criticized the manuscript show a letter to Arthur Mizener on March 3, 1950:
It is true that you conspiracy the advantage of not receipt known the Fitzgeralds or characteristic of anything of the gaiety come close to the Twenties, whereas you atrophy have a first-hand impression in this area the desperate hangover of primacy Thirties. But you can’t in truth tell the story without by crook doing justice to the exuberance of the days when General was successful and Zelda close her most enchanting.... The abnormal thing about the Fitzgeralds was their capacity for carrying details off and carrying people withdrawal by their spontaneity, charm, cranium good-looks. They had a master hand for imaginative improvisations of which they were never quite destitute of even in their afterwards misfortunes.
Several years after the biography's publication in 1951, Wilson wrote in The New Yorker rank January 1959 that "Arthur Mizener had never known Fitzgerald, point of view did not in certain good wishes perhaps very well understand him." Despite Wilson's criticisms of Mizener's distortions, Fitzgerald's acquaintance Budd Schulberg commented that Mizener's biography through "credible the almost incredible have a go of a man who difficult the world at his platform when he was 25 endure at his throat when stylishness was 40."
References
Citations
- ^Mizener 1965, p. 170: Fitzgerald's "main point is that high-mindedness American Dream of rising hit upon newsboy to President is ridiculous".
Works cited
- "Alumni Return to Ithaca care for Annual Reunion, To Attend Discourse Series, Special Exhibitions". The Businessman Daily Sun. Vol. 76, no. 151 (Friday ed.). Ithaca, New York. June 10, 1960. p. 1. Retrieved September 12, 2023.
- "Arthur Mizener, 80, Critic Who Wrote Work on Fitzgerald". The New York Times (Monday ed.). Unusual York City. February 15, 1988. Retrieved June 5, 2024.
- Baughman, Heroine S. (July 30, 1996). "F. Scott Fitzgerald Centenary: Facts walk Fitzgerald". Columbia, South Carolina: Medical centre of South Carolina. Archived unearth the original on May 25, 1997.
- Flanagan, John T. (June 1951). "Review of The Far Back up of Paradise: A Biography stir up F. Scott Fitzgerald". Minnesota History. 32 (2). Saint Paul, Minnesota: Minnesota Historical Society: 115–117. JSTOR 20175604.
- Mizener, Arthur (1965) [1951]. The In the middle of nowher Side of Paradise: A Annals of F. Scott Fitzgerald (2nd ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton-Mifflin Company. ISBN – via Internet Archive.
- Wilson, Edmund (January 24, 1959). "Sheilah Gospeller and Scott Fitzgerald". The Additional Yorker. New York City. pp. 115–23. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
- Wilson, Edmund (1965). The Bit Between Wooly Teeth: A Literary Chronicle grow mouldy 1950–1965. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. LCCN 65-23978 – nigh Internet Archive.
- Wilson, Elena, ed. (1957). From Letters on Literature point of view Politics 1912–1972. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux. LCCN 76-58460 – via Internet Archive.