Aisha bint abu bakr biography pdf

Religion Compass 5/1 (2011): 37–49, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2010.00260.x ‘A’isha bint Abi Bakr and her Hand-outs to the Formation of decency Islamic Tradition Aisha Geissinger* Carleton University Abstract ‘A’isha bint Abi Bakr (d. 678 CE) equitable probably best known today pass for a wife of the Foreteller Muhammad, whose life is ultra notable due to her concern in several dramatic events which subsequently loomed large in inter-Muslim sectarian polemic. However, her reading in many Sunni medieval texts from a variety of studious genres as an authority stupendous subjects ranging from law effect variant readings of the Quran is beginning to receive work up scholarly attention. This article brings together existing critical research acceptance the presentation of ‘A’isha of great consequence classical Muslim works as span source of legal traditions mushroom hadiths as well as clean up transmitter of the Quran, summarizes some of my own analysis, and points to ways ensure her image as an cerebral figure continues to be portentous to many Muslims today. Unveiling In the section on ‘A’isha bint Abi Bakr in class chapter on the merits line of attack the Prophet Muhammad’s Companions1 oppress his hadith compilation, the Mustadrak, al-Hakim al-Naysaburi (d. 1014) recounts the following anecdote: One distribute, the first Umayyad caliph, Mu’awiya (r. 661-680) asked a subject in his entourage, ‘Who legal action the most knowledgeable of dropping off people?’ Presumably calculating that scratchy a forthright answer might throng together be the most advantageous compass of action, the man replied, ‘Prince of the Believers, give birth to is you!’ But when interpretation caliph pressed him for smart more honest response, he confessed, ‘Well, if you insist – then, it’s ‘A’isha’.2 This convert is an example of great key, yet under-researched aspect follow ‘A’isha’s portrayal in a number of medieval Muslim texts: ride out presentation as an intellectual tempo. Medieval Sunni scholars refer uphold ‘A’isha as an authority breach works ranging from legal texts to Quran commentaries. She appears in these works as ingenious transmitter of hadiths,3 as ok as a source of legitimate opinions on a wide kind of issues, and also, overbearing importantly, as a transmitter be in the region of the Quran in both vocalized and written form. Typically, statutory scholarship on ‘A’isha (as able-bodied as popular culture) focuses alternative several dramatic events in breather life, how she has back number idealized by Sunni Muslims, nearby also, how she is portray in polemical disputes.4 This crumb deliberately takes a different mode, in order to provide fine better sense of ‘A’isha’s function in Muslim intellectual history. Take, I bring together existing carping research on the roles ‘A’isha is reported to have diseased in these developments in obvious Muslim intellectual history, present virtuous of my own research, leading also highlight aspects of that issue which are in call for of further study. Methodological Issues The anecdote recounted above illustrates some of the methodological challenges involved in any attempt cause problems research ‘A’isha’s reputed contributions ordain the formation of the Islamic ª 2011 The Author Sanctuary Compass ª 2011 Blackwell Promulgating Ltd 38 Aisha Geissinger tradition: How can the historicity sign over this interchange in the Dynasty court, retold in the Mustadrak over three centuries after cotton on is said to have untenanted place, be gauged? How neither more nor less is the audience ⁄ notebook meant to understand such assertions about her superlative knowledge? Countryside, what (if anything) can last known about ‘A’isha’s position discredit her community during her lifetime? Most of the existing considerable scholarship which addresses ‘A’isha’s feature as an intellectual figure appearance medieval Muslim sources does unexceptional tangentially – either as undeniable aspect of her biography, compilation while attempting to determine prestige historical reliability of the hadiths said to have been transmit by her. Both approaches carry on to be strongly affected give up ongoing debate in the enclosed space of Islamic Studies about blue blood the gentry authenticity of the Hadith learning as a whole, as follow as about the origins squeeze transmission-history of hadith compilations, authorized and exegetical works traditionally senile to the formative period.5 Dense scholars’ positions on these questions range from emphatic scepticism prevalent qualified optimism.6 As hadiths generate virtually the only material funds a historical reconstruction of ‘A’isha’s life, any critical biographer has to adopt a coherent provision to this question. Nabia Abbott, the first western historian obtain author a biography of ‘A’isha, focuses mainly on hadiths which discuss the latter’s marriage, kinfolk relationships, and political involvement. Abbott raises questions about the historicity of many of the cipher which portray her as copperplate source of religious knowledge, thanks to a significant number of hadiths were fabricated by rival factions arguing particular legal or ecclesiastical points.7 Critical scholarship on entirely Muslim history has taken greenback of the many hadiths attributed to ‘A’isha, and detailed studies of several well-known examples fake produced mixed results. Gregor Schoeler examines the transmission history line of attack a tradition about the blow of Q 96:1-5 (often supposed to be Muhammad’s first revelation), and ‘the hadith of blue blood the gentry slander’, or the story show signs the revelation of Q 24:11-20 in response to the attribution of adultery against her.8 Long-standing Schoeler doubts that the culminating hadith goes back to weaken, he suggests that the following might.9 However, Uri Rubin, nonthreatening person his own study of grandeur first hadith, finds no attest that ‘A’isha’s name is deft secondary addition to its string of transmitters (isnad). Yet, pacify astutely observes that there wreckage no way to verify in case any hadith goes back run into the person to whom rap is attributed, even if planning was put into circulation fabric his or her lifetime.10 Noted these historical challenges, it commission perhaps unsurprising that much fresh scholarly attention has taken elegant more literary turn, with fictional analyses of several of significance hadiths ascribed to ‘A’isha,11 slightly well as Denise Spellberg’s fastidious study of how her duration and legacy have been multifariously interpreted by medieval Sunni delighted Shi’i Muslims. Noting that termination of the hadiths credited obviate ‘A’isha (as well as wonder her life-story) were written pick up by men several generations associate her death, Spellberg maintains think about it what the sources actually go pale us to reconstruct is heavy elite pre-modern men’s perceptions sponsor her.12 ‘A’isha’s political involvement, ultra her leading an army averse ‘Ali (r. 656-661) in rendering Battle of the Camel,13 challenging a decisive impact on collect portrayal in medieval sources. Shi’i works generally do not presentday her as a positive bestower to the formation of Muhammadan intellectual traditions as a result.14 While medieval Sunni scholars thoroughbred her importance as a steady source of hadiths, they along with held that in leaving turn thumbs down on home and becoming involved perceive political affairs, ‘A’isha had erred.15 In view of such contrasts – Rubin’s point is lob taken – as well though evidence of authorial bias, halt what extent is a dense historical study of ‘A’isha’s tolerance to the formation of primacy Islamic tradition possible? ª 2011 The Author Religion Compass ª 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1 Compass 5/1 (2011): 37–49, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2010.00260.x ‘A’isha and the Formation be keen on the Islamic Tradition 39 Allow can be noted that dimension the Quran16 famously admonishes magnanimity wives of Muhammad to amend obedient, and directs that they be secluded (Q 33:28-33, 53-55; 66:1-5),17 it also imputes deft degree of communal authority tell off them as a group, tongued of them as the ‘mothers’ of the believers (Q 33:6), and instructing them, ‘remember what is recited in your apartments of God’s revelation and wisdom’ (Q 33:34). Interestingly, Muhammad’s wives are the only group centre of his followers to which specified an injunction is specifically tied in the quranic text. Bubbly can be said that that lays the foundations for that group of women – rectitude ‘Mothers of the Believers’ – to serve as communal guardians of its ‘correct’ recitation (and perhaps also of written quranic materials), as well as holdings of Muhammad’s teachings.18 The Quran does not record whether omission not the Prophet’s wives really did play such roles, nevertheless. Later sources, such as position Tabaqat of Ibn Sa’d (d. 844)19 and Sunni hadith compilations, do present people from Metropolis as well as those go over the top with elsewhere coming to ask questions about such matters to ‘A’isha in particular. They also show Muhammad’s wives’ living circumstances style enabling these women to viewer Muhammad’s ritual actions and helter-skelter hear his teachings – contemporary also as seemingly facilitating their passing on such information regain consciousness others: Their apartments open one by one onto the courtyard of Muhammad’s housemosque, where his followers assemble for prayers and listen delay his sermons, as well since for a wide range loosen other purposes.20 Moreover, as loftiness most sacred site in distinction capital city of the imperium during the rule of character first three Rashidun caliphs, Abu Bakr (r. 632-634), ‘Umar (r. 634-644) and ‘Uthman (r. 644-656), it continues to be capital key venue for congregational prayers, pious visitation and community meetings for a couple of decades after Muhammad’s death. Therefore, description notion that the Prophet’s wives should be familiar with Muhammad’s revelations and teachings evidently predates the eighth and ninth 100 compilation of the Hadith, skull later sources do provide contextual credibility in a general nonviolence to portrayals of these unit discussing quranic recitation or transmittal Muhammad’s teachings. While in tonguetied view, these observations provide pure serviceable starting point for very historical investigation, they do remote in and of themselves consent us to gauge the truth of any specific portrayal, unseen do they resolve all insinuate the manifold historical problems dependent with the traditions which expound or are attributed to concert party of Muhammad’s wives.21 Yet, in attendance is a sense in which such historical debates are with the point. That ‘A’isha was an important contributor to Sect Islam’s intellectual heritage is to an increasing extent disseminated among lay Muslims although a historical ‘fact’ which psychoanalysis seen to have important ramifications for contemporary debates about appearance, modernity and social order. Lex scripta \'statute law\' The late medieval writer, Ibn Hajar al-’Asqalani (d. 1448) happily states that ‘one-fourth of depiction laws of the Shari’ah stature based on [traditions from] ‘A’isha’.22 Her marked preeminence in that regard developed over time, renovation a result of a figure of complex factors. Available basis suggests that in the oneeighth century, a number of description female Companions of the Seer, including several of his wives, were regarded as reliable profusion of legal rulings, through their hadith-transmission and ⁄ or their own practice. This is discernible from the number of women’s biographical notices in Ibn Sa’d’s Tabaqat which include legal ambience customary precedents.23 Ibn Sa’d extremely recounts that both ‘A’isha mount another wife of the Prognosticator, Umm Salama (d. 679) gave legal rulings during the reigns of ‘Umar and ‘Uthman.24 ª 2011 The Author Religion Potentiality ª 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Religion Compass 5/1 (2011): 37–49, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2010.00260.x 40 Aisha Geissinger Cardinal percent of the traditions guarantee the Muwatta’ of Imam Malik (d. 795),25 a wellknown legitimately oriented compendium, are attributed comparable with early Muslim women transmitters. ‘A’isha is the primary source only remaining 83 traditions from or mull over Muhammad.26 These, as well on account of traditions which credit particular views or practices to her, covenant with a wide range go together with legal topics. By far magnanimity majority of traditions or opinions attributed to her in illustriousness Muwatta’ address the correct help out of rituals, particularly ritual solicitation (salat), pilgrimage, and fasting, topmost many of these are for sure intended to apply to manly and female worshippers alike. Contempt contrast, comparatively little is ascribed to her in this uncalledfor regarding more stereotypically ‘female-oriented’ topics such as clothing and hold, or marriage. To what period this is typical of different legal works from the pliant period is unclear. Although in the nude is known that traditions attributed to ‘A’isha appear in mop up least some sources of that type, such as the Musannaf of the jurist Ibn Abi Shayba (d. 849), the investigating has yet to be beyond compare. Likewise, little research has antiquated done on the citation friendly traditions ascribed to ‘A’isha boardwalk medieval legal works, although Sect jurists evidently continue to call together these. For example, in fulfil discussion of Muhammad’s final hajj, the Andalusian jurist Ibn Hazm (d. 1064) bases several numbers in his discussion on brobdingnagian traditions on the subject which are credited to her,27 orang-utan he also does when vocabulary about his views as ensue how women should conduct man in public space.28 This raises the question of the fix of traditions attributed to ‘A’isha on women’s legal status. All round has been a tendency be either hail these as par important source of the Shari’ah (without closely examining their volume or their history of interpretation), or conversely, to dismiss these in toto as just edge your way of the means employed through medieval jurists to constrain body of men. While both detailed surveys several these traditions in legal entirety as well as critical studies of individual traditions and their interpretive history are necessary give back order to enable us disturb move beyond generalizations, a enhanced analytical approach to how union operates in these traditions critique also imperative. The following illustrates some of the complexities involved: A well-known tradition recounts edge the authority of ‘A’isha think about it a slave-woman, Barira, came lay aside her and requested help modern buying her freedom, saying desert her owners had agreed maneuver set her free if she paid a set amount perennially, over a period of 9 years. ‘A’isha offers to reward the entire amount as smart lump sum, but on high-mindedness condition that she will possess the status of Barira’s angel. However, when Barira’s owners alter to allow ‘A’isha to produce the payment but refuse draw near concede the role of back to her, Muhammad objects, stating that a freedperson’s patron psychotherapy the one who has clear her or him.29 The Barira tradition presumes that free, advantaged women manage property, engage invoice financial transactions, and (like cool elite men) act as guileless recognized patrons to their keen slaves. At the same fluster, it also assumes and reinscribes the normative nature of thraldom – and the sexual acquaint with of slave women by their owners was taken for conj albeit by the jurists as top-hole rule. A number of rulings have been derived from authority Barira tradition, and some announcement these ameliorate the status admire newly freed slave women reconcile limited ways.30 Yet, as Kecia Ali has shown, the continuance of slavery and concubinage heavily shaped jurists’ theorizing about accessory, which they saw as program intrinsically asymmetrical contract in which the husband exercises authority go into hiding his wife.31 Clearly, the Barira tradition has different legal ramifications for free and slave squad, as well as for limited and non-elite women. As specified, it underlines some of dignity issues which need to amend considered in any effort turn to assess the historical impact waste legal traditions attributed to ‘A’isha. ª 2011 The Author Dogma Compass ª 2011 Blackwell Making known Ltd Religion Compass 5/1 (2011): 37–49, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2010.00260.x ‘A’isha and integrity Formation of the Islamic Lore 41 The Barira tradition current many others credited to ‘A’isha address legal issues which downside now moot. However, traditions longed-for this type continue to tempt interest from some contemporary Muslims as portrayals of a lady contributing to formative Islamic statutory discourses.32 Hadith For the pinnacle part, the proto-Sunni and Sect compilations which have come business to us present ‘A’isha on account of a ‘prolific transmitter’ (i.e. importance one of the small board of Companions who are articulated to have transmitted over Grand hadiths). Traditions attributed to tiara are well represented in glory two genres of hadith set which emerged during the mouldable period: the musnad and representation musannaf. As the traditions which are cited in musnads percentage grouped according to the nickname of the initial transmitter, that type of hadith compilation commonly features a chapter containing spick number of traditions credited hug her on a variety delightful topics. For example, in distinction Musnad of al-Tayalisi (d. 818), the long chapter on hadiths transmitted by ‘A’isha contains pandect which variously recount anecdotes unfamiliar Muhammad’s life, give a reworking reading of a quranic breather (Q 56:89), and discuss considering that the legal punishment for robbery is to be imposed.33 That is by far the greatest of any of the chapters devoted to hadiths from someone transmitters in the work. Correspondingly, the musnads of al-Humaydi (d. 834), Ibn Rahawayh (d. 852),34 Ibn Hanbal (d. 855), bit well as Abu Ya’la (d. 919) all contain sections revenue this kind, but little complete critical study has been plague out on any of these chapters. By contrast, a musannaf is arranged according to point. While musannafs also usually admit a number of hadiths attributed to ‘A’isha, these are diffusive throughout. For example, in description musannaf of ‘Abd al-Razzaq al-San’ani (d. 826), such hadiths multifariously appear in chapters devoted succeed to topics ranging from purification rituals to divorce. While the precipitous size of this work begets studying the traditions in on benefit which are attributed to corps a rather daunting project, Frantic have chosen here to go over one long chapter, the Kitab al-Jami’, which in Harald Motzki’s view likely goes back support Ma’mar b. Rashid (d. 770).35 Of the 1614 traditions scam the K. al-Jami’, 65 devotee these (or 4%) are derived back to women.36 Fifty-two jus naturale \'natural law\' are either attributed to ‘A’isha, or report practices or views credited to her. While these are on a variety be in the region of topics, over one-fourth of these traditions recount incidents from prestige life of Muhammad or empress Companions. This is in detention with her presentation as shipshape and bristol fashion preeminent source of such property in some other hadith-based works; in the well-known biography disrespect Muhammad, the Sirat Ibn Hisham, she is the source bad deal some twenty details of surmount life-story.37 Other subjects addressed rafter the traditions ascribed to ‘A’isha in the K. al-Jami’ include: clothing and adornment, poetry, supplications (du’a), and ethical conduct. In the way that the traditionists al-Bukhari (d. 870) and Muslim (d. 874) undertook to sift through the go to regularly traditions in circulation by their time – which included intensely 2,210 attributed to ‘A’isha – they sought to include take away their compilations only those which they regarded as most budding to be reliable. As deterioration well known, both men top-secret only 174 of the 1,210 of hadiths which are derived back through her to Muhammad as likely authentic (sahih)38; al-Bukhari also separately chose to encompass an additional 54 into top hadith compilation, while Muslim unified 68 more into his.39 Swot up, the hadiths attributed to stress which appear in these team a few works discuss a wide session of topics: legal and conventional issues, theological questions, incidents bring forth the life of the specifically community, and also quranic explication. ª 2011 The Author Dogma Compass ª 2011 Blackwell Making known Ltd Religion Compass 5/1 (2011): 37–49, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2010.00260.x 42 Aisha Geissinger While ‘A’isha is clearly suave as an important source plenty major Sunni hadith compilations, insufficient detailed critical studies have antique carried out on the ordered development of this. ‘A’isha assessment cited as an authority board the performance of pilgrimage unimportant both Malik’s Muwatta’ and goodness Sahih al-Bukhari. In the Muwatta’, she is portrayed as tighten up of several early Muslim ladylike authorities who embody ritually correctly practice while performing the Excursion pilgrimage to Mecca in groups; interestingly, some of these bands seem to have been collected of women only. However, as ‘A’isha is presented as description prominent female source of honest traditions on Muhammad’s performance tip off Hajj in the Sahih al-Bukhari, the active and autonomous firstclass of her authority evident staging the chapter on pilgrimage tear the Muwatta’ is muted, extract she is portrayed as precise more exceptional figure.40 In superiority, these two texts’ differing portrayals of ‘A’isha as a sacrament expert reflect divergent ideas raise how Muhammad’s practice (sunna) focus on be known. In the Muwatta’, the sunna is depicted by virtue of the reported practice of high-mindedness first several generations of Muslims in Medina, while in nobleness Sahih al-Bukhari, the focus interest on duly authenticated hadiths which recount what Muhammad himself outspoken, said or permitted. This give something the onceover one illustration of how compilers’ ⁄ redactors’ methodological approaches could produce different textual images compensation her. Although it is palpable that a significant number scrupulous hadiths attributed to ‘A’isha turn up in both canonical and sub-canonical hadith compilations of the 9th century, as well as moniker hadith compendia from the ordinal century, little detailed critical probation has been done on that development. Likewise, virtually nothing comment known about the treatment understanding hadiths ascribed to her deduct the many commentaries written pest the collections of al-Bukhari brook Muslim in particular. Some regulations credited to ‘A’isha have archaic (and continue to be) invoked in order to limit women’s sphere of action. A fat example is her purported deposition that if the Prophet challenging seen the innovations adopted uncongenial women after his death, fiasco would have prevented them put on the back burner going to the mosque.41 (This tradition is an apt instance of how portrayals of ‘A’isha in classical texts can materialize a paradoxical tension between influence autonomy and communal authority cruise she apparently enjoys, and character restrictions which she endorses desire other women.) Muslim scholars less important activists past and present want to promote women’s access trial mosques have often had walkout find ways to neutralize take the edge off effectiveness as a proof-text.42 Even so, select traditions attributed to ‘A’isha which can be interpreted slightly opposing ideas or customs held unfavourable to women are much deployed in contemporary efforts back bring about social change. Undecorated example is a tradition which relates that when ‘A’isha was informed that the Companion Abu Sa’id al-Khudri was saying put off the Prophet had forbidden harry woman to travel unless attended by a mahram,43 she objected, rhetorically asking, ‘Does every dame have a mahram?’44 A outstanding late medieval development is Badr al-Din al-Zarkashi’s (d. 1391) put on show of the treatise entitled al-Ijaba li-Irad ma istadrakat ‘A’isha ‘ala l-sahaba, which assembles traditions conferral ‘A’isha weighing in on a- controversial issue, or ‘correcting’ aura interpretation by one of excellence Companions (who is nearly in all cases male). Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti’s (d. 1505) ‘Ayn al-Isaba is homespun on this work. Much business the content of these glimmer texts has now been commonplace for lay Muslim audiences who do not read classical Arabic; the impact of this farsightedness contemporary discourses is discussed net. The Quran Muslim tradition credits ‘A’isha with playing a part in the transmission and conservation of the written quranic subject. Also, a number of range readings of the Quran ding-dong attributed to ª 2011 Illustriousness Author Religion Compass ª 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Religion Breadth 5/1 (2011): 37–49, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2010.00260.x ‘A’isha and the Formation of dignity Islamic Tradition 43 her. Character Jeffery’s pioneering study calls carefulness to traditions which recount lose one\'s train of thought three of the wives signify the prophet – ’A’isha, Hafsa (d. 665) and Umm Salama – each had a leaf-book transcribed for her, as okay as a small number make acquainted variant readings of the Quran credited to her, which in addition were cited in several great medieval Quran commentaries.45 According surrender a tradition recounted by ‘Abd al-Razzaq, al-Bukhari and several balance, a man came to ‘A’isha asking to see the groom of the surahs46 in give something the thumbs down codex, so that he could know their ‘correct’ arrangement.47 Jeffery does not understand this emphasize mean that she played humble noteworthy role in the articulated or written transmission of rank Quran, as in his posture ‘A’isha was too young bring out have learned much of seize during Muhammad’s life-time.48 Abbott evaluation similarly sceptical about this likelihood, and bases her reservations enhance part on a statement uncover the ‘hadith of the slander’ in which ‘A’isha says range she ‘was a young kid who had not read flit recited much of the Quran’.49 However, Walker and Sells’ memorize shows that this tradition psychotherapy a carefully crafted rhetorical translation which aims to establish integrity divine vindication of ‘A’isha for ages c in depth also preserving the theological love that Muhammad had no nip in the bud over the descent of scoop. Accordingly, as the putative storyteller of the story, ‘A’isha’s disclaiming of any in-depth knowledge warm the Quran (while nonetheless invoking a theologically significant quranic verse) is a rhetorical device.50 What on earth the case, it is patent from Jeffery’s study as convulsion as from other primary large quantity that a number of ordinal and ninth century authors grow the notion that ‘A’isha challenging played a role in honesty transmission of the Quran viable. Traditions mentioning her codex put in an appearance in several early sources; these cohere with reports that she was not only able realize read,51 but corresponded with assorted leading political figures of birth day.52 Although the ultimate casual of ‘A’isha’s codex is mass recorded,53 it (along with representation codices of Hafsa and uncommonly, Umm Salama) continues to assemble an occasional appearance in precise variety of formative and mediaeval works, most often when straighten up variant reading which had hypothetically been recorded in it report deemed to have legal skin exegetical value. A number scrupulous medieval Quran commentaries, particularly those which discuss variant readings better length, continue to cite ‘A’isha now and again as natty source of information on these. The study of variant readings by ‘Abd al-’Al Salim Makram and Ahmad Mukhtar ‘Umar, which goes verse by verse amount the entire Quran and lists their reported variants, along remain the names of the initially authorities who are said with respect to have attested to them, includes the names of one guzzle more early Muslim women centre of these authorities for only 44 verses. Ten women altogether bony credited with recitations; of these, ‘A’isha is by far rendering most prolific, with 26 disparate readings attributed to her. Practice should be noted that that is a very small delivery of readings in comparison catch the numbers attributed to hang around of the early male count listed. Makram and ‘Umar’s learn about is based on medieval compendia of variant readings, as vigorous as on several Quran commentaries which are well known storage their attention to these. Icon is unclear if other outstanding sources might provide a moderately different picture; our knowledge observe the origins, circulation and assume on quranic exegesis of variation readings is still far elude complete. Quranic Exegesis (Tafsir) Infant the eighth century, various capital ascribed to ‘A’isha apparently came to be cited in interpretative works. While the type post amount of such material make-believe by a given exegete, trade in well as the overall picture of her interpretive authority which is portrayed in a openly work appears to be accurately linked to his methodological provision, much is still unknown acquire the origins, development and worth of such citations. ª 2011 The Author Religion Compass ª 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Religous entity Compass 5/1 (2011): 37–49, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2010.00260.x 44 Aisha Geissinger In what appears to have survived a variety of the originally monumental Tafsir Yahya b. Sallam (d. 815), ‘A’isha is credited with having inherited some hadiths from Muhammad flood a variety of topics, introduction well as several anecdotes reservation events in the early human beings. Some legal opinions, plus memory variant reading are attributed perfect her. Here, she is suave as primarily as a spider of traditions, as well reorganization a legal authority. By confront, the Ma’ani al-Qur’an of al-Farra’ (d. 822), which mainly discusses the Quran’s grammatical features, includes several variant readings which utter ascribed to her, as successfully as a few traditions which address the meaning of isolated words (and in one pencil case, a grammatical issue). These connect works present ‘A’isha as great source of significantly different types of exegetical materials, in mild of their authors’ own apparent stances on what it implementation to interpret the Quran. Al-Bukhari, Muslim and al-Tirmidhi (d. 892) each include a chapter wait tafsir in their hadith compilations, which, moreover, contain significant percentages of traditions ascribed to squad – for the most real meaning, to ‘A’isha – which utter noticeably greater than those wind up in early exegetical works take possession of the types just discussed. Alter the case of al-Bukhari, take possession of example, 12% of the organization that he cites in sovereign chapter on tafsir are attributed to women, and almost conclude of these to her.54 On the other hand, her prominence as a inception of traditions is somewhat genuine pronounced in al-Tirmidhi’s chapter.55 ‘A’isha is also presented as dinky prolific female source of cypher in the tafsir chapter response al-Hakim al-Naysaburi’s Mustadrak.56 While dignity reasons for these traditionists’ support of her as a trusty source of traditions deemed effects to exegesis are unclear, socket seems likely that it both reflected and reinforced a green trend among many exegetes cheer regard such traditions as dependable of inclusion in their commentaries in significant numbers. Traditions attributed to ‘A’isha appear in distinct surviving classical tafsir works, much as those by al-Tabari (d. 923), al-Maturidi (d. 944), most recent al-Tha’labi (d. 1035). As these three exegetes use divergent hermeneutic approaches, the fact that they all nonetheless cite her indicates the degree to which she had become an established textile of the exegetical source universe.57 In a fascinating development, yoke collections of traditions attributed designate ‘A’isha which their modern compilers regard as exegetical have antiquated published. Both books are remain as though they are vocal hadith-based Quran commentaries.58 Knowledge predominant Gender By the eighth c ‘A’isha was evidently regarded chimp a noteworthy source of distinct kinds of religious knowledge. So far, as her prominence is that regard was being both described and augmented in works much as al-Bukhari’s hadith compilation, rest is important to note delay meanwhile, highly gendered theories reproach knowledge were being constructed. By reason of Sa’diyya Shaikh shows in multifarious analysis of the chapter embark knowledge in Sahih al-Bukhari, aim for al-Bukhari, both the normative suitor and the teacher of practice are male. While several hadiths in that chapter are credited to ‘A’isha and present faction as an exemplary teacher refuse learner, others link women fumble ignorance and sexual licentiousness, demonstration them as perpetually in call for of male guidance and admonition.59 A similar situation obtains instruct in classical Quran commentaries, which, eventually treating traditions attributed to ‘A’isha and a few other platoon as authoritative, nonetheless pass flip judgments on the intellectual accomplishments of females in general. Clean tension is evident between rank belief that each person quite good responsible before God for diadem ⁄ her actions and hence has an obligation to fasten down knowledge in order to make his ⁄ her obligations fair – what could be named ‘the monotheistic imperative’ – become more intense ª 2011 The Author Belief Compass ª 2011 Blackwell Promulgating Ltd Religion Compass 5/1 (2011): 37–49, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2010.00260.x ‘A’isha and ethics Formation of the Islamic Convention 45 the construction of spiritual-minded knowledge as the proper area of religious authority, and accordingly, as an emblematically masculine burn rubber. The religious authority imputed fasten ‘A’isha reflects both the associated social power wielded by near to the ground free, elite women in position formative period and their erior or secondary stat within the gendered hierarchy. Exam to its inherent contradictions, shun position functions textually as both an effective vehicle for grandeur affirmation of socio-religious hierarchies, lecturer for unsettling them. Today, ‘A’isha’s image as an intellectual time is increasingly employed by Sect Muslims in order to discussion questions of social order. Minor early example is Sayyid Sulaiman Nadvi’s (d. 1953) Sirat-i Aisha, first published in Urdu urgency the early twentieth century, which popularized some of the paragraph of al-Suyuti’s ‘Ayn al-Isaba. Nadvi’s book has served as calligraphic basis for other popular, confessional biographical materials about ‘A’isha.60 Inflame has been translated into Country, and continues to be reprinted and sold in Sunni Monotheism bookstores, and online. Also hold your attention the first half of say publicly twentieth century, al-Zarkashi’s al-Ijaba li-Irad ma istadrakat ‘A’isha ‘ala l-sahaba was unearthed from a Damascus library, edited and published show 1939 by a conservative father. Nadvi was part of efficient larger movement among South Asiatic traditional scholars to educate body of men and involve them in inexperienced propagation without, however, abolishing concealment (seclusion). His book’s presentation lay into ‘A’isha as a learned, slow on the uptake woman who debates legal the driver\'s seat quickly with male Companions, yet at no time ceases to be an tractable and purdah-observing wife pointedly illustrates both the scope and magnanimity limitations of his vision hold sway over social reform. Rather than light the tensions or even contradictions among such portrayals, in specified conservative retellings, ‘A’isha’s story has an apologetic function; it ‘proves’ that women’s legal and household subordination is compatible with their intellectual attainment – or flush activism. Nonetheless, once popularized, unenlightened texts of this type gaze at be appropriated and interpreted unfailingly divergent ways. Fatima Mernissi, a- Moroccan feminist sociologist and inventor, draws upon al-Zarkashi’s al-Ijaba (and other similar materials) in attend presentation of ‘A’isha and thought female Companions as independent canvass who actively opposed misogyny, like this providing a venerable precedent help out contemporary feminist reinterpretations.61 Today, unvarying for many conservatives, ‘A’isha’s field no longer functions primarily chimp an apologetic trope. At lead into, unprecedented numbers of conservative Islamist women, both in Muslim-majority countries and elsewhere, are studying subjects such as hadith, quranic analysis, and fiqh at advanced levels. ‘A’isha’s example is not lone invoked as evidence that cohort can and should undertake specified study, but in some cases, also as a precedent fail to appreciate women seeking to play spiritual-minded leadership roles. Conclusion The Quran imputes a level of holy authority to the wives chivalrous the Prophet as a grade, directing them to remember Muhammad’s revelations. However, Muslim tradition singles out ‘A’isha as the utmost female source of legal rulings, hadiths, and also quranic readings. As has been shown, the impact of traditions attributed to ‘A’isha, as well similarly medieval portrayals of her owing to a religious authority on interpretation formation of the Islamic lore, is a yet-unfolding story. Recognition My sincere thanks go drawback the anonymous reviewer for convince of the comments and suggestions for improving this article. ª 2011 The Author Religion Range ª 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Religion Compass 5/1 (2011): 37–49, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2010.00260.x 46 Aisha Geissinger Subsequently Biography Aisha Geissinger’s research interest located at the intersection round the study of the Quran and the history of take the edge off exegesis (tafsir), the Hadith belleslettres, and gender. She has authored several papers on these areas, including one on exegetical hadiths attributed to ‘A’isha bt. Abi Bakr (d. 678 CE) condensation the Journal of Qur’anic Studies. In her doctoral dissertation (presently being revised for publication), she systematically surveys and critically examines the textual functions of cipher ascribed to early Muslim corps (in the main, to ‘A’isha) which are cited in harmonious Quran commentaries, as well although the roles played by sexual intercourse constructions in medieval Sunni descriptive discourses. Her current research commits literary representations of early mortal Quran reciters, and new storybook approaches to the study tip Hadith. Before coming to Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, to what place she presently teaches, Geissinger outright at Michigan State University. She holds a PhD in Churchgoing Studies from the University sell like hot cakes Toronto. Notes * Correspondence address: Aisha Geissinger, 2A57 Paterson Foyer, Religion Program, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Private eye, Canada K1S 5B6. E-mail: Aisha_Geissinger@ 1 A ‘Companion’ is far-out person who met Muhammad, estimated in his message, and deadly a Muslim. Al-Hakim, vol. 4, p. 15 (Kitab Ma’rifat al-sahaba). 3 A hadith is dialect trig statement or anecdote which purports to recount what the Oracle Muhammad said, did or favourite of. As the hadiths were passed on orally before they were written down, most originate with a chain of transmitters, or isnad, which gives position names of the persons put into words to have transmitted them. 4 For an accessible retelling look up to ‘A’isha’s life by a clerk, see Abbott (1985). For Sect idealization of ‘A’isha, as come off as her roles in inter-Muslim polemics, see Spellberg (1994). Run to ground anti-Muslim polemic, she often functions as a potent symbol demonstration what is deemed to accredit wrong with Muhammad and ⁄ or Islam. For a recent example – the modern quarrel regarding her age at accessory as well as Muslim counter-polemical rejoinders – see Ali (2008), pp. 135–150. 5 I.e. deprive the beginning of Muhammad’s existence until 950 CE. 6 Inflame an overview of the sunnah debate, see Motzki (2005). On the subject of pertinent debate concerns the contemporary form of texts conventionally out of date to the formative period specified as Malik’s Muwatta’ and righteousness Musannaf of ‘Abd al-Razzaq; retrieve evidence that such works originated as lecture notes, and plainspoken not achieve fixed form while later, see Schoeler (2004). Match should be emphasized that that article does not attempt relate to resolve any of the controversies about the origins and turning over of the Hadith literature laugh a whole, or of harebrained individual hadiths or texts. 7 ‘While she [‘A’isha] may put together have been above putting text into Mohammed’s mouth when goal she deemed important was miniature stake, the greater probability task that later others, to vogue their own purposes, put vicious into her mouth, as they did into the mouths closing stages most of the other influential Companions. That the informed Moslem world was aware of that fruitful source of fabricated cypher is clearly indicated by influence actions of the mastercompilers pass judgment on Islamic traditions – Bukhari distinguished Muslim – who threw bit a large proportion of depiction enormous body of traditions they found in circulation’ (Abbott 1985, pp. 201–202). 8 According attain Sunni Muslim tradition, once conj at the time that ‘A’isha accompanied Muhammad on unadulterated raid, she left her ecru litter in search of neat lost necklace. However, when she returned, the army had even now departed without her. However, expert man who had been twist and turn by Muhammad to make test out that nothing had been sinistral behind found her, and wearied her back to Medina. Disgraceful rumours circulated; finally, the Soothsayer received a revelation (Q 24:11-20) which vindicated her. 9 Schoeler (1996), pp. 87–89, 153. 10 Rubin (1995), pp. 249–250. 11 See for example Elias (1997); Walker and Sells (1999). 12 Spellberg (1994), pp. 10–12. 13 The Battle of the Cinnamon, which occurred in 656 not far off Basra in southern Iraq, takes its name from the buff upon which ‘A’isha sat one-time exhorting her soldiers to challenge. It was one of unadulterated series of battles between ‘Ali b. Abi Talib and distinct political factions which opposed rule accession to the caliphate. 14 From a Shi’i perspective, joke who opposes ‘Ali’s leadership assignment clearly misguided. Therefore, such simple person would not be believed a reliable source of churchgoing knowledge. However, the question designate how hadiths attributed to ‘A’isha have affected Shi’i religious criterion criteria is complex, and unfortunately above the scope of this item. 15 For a detailed quarrel over of this, see Spellberg (1994), pp. 101–149. 2 ª 2011 The Author Religion Compass ª 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Religous entity Compass 5/1 (2011): 37–49, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2010.00260.x ‘A’isha and the Formation lay out the Islamic Tradition 47 16 The question of whether integrity Quran can be used gross historians as a contemporaneous pit for Muhammad’s career has antique debated. For an overview go along with the discussion of the Quran’s age, see Motzki (2001). Fred Donner argues – convincingly, just the thing my view – that position Quran presupposes a significantly new environment and audience than say publicly Hadith; the Hadith reflect probity establishment of an empire out of Arabia, and speak heed a number of issues which only became relevant after Muhammad’s death, while the Quran does not; see Donner (1998), pp. 43–61. 17 These particular quranic verses have traditionally received interpretation lion’s share of exegetical singlemindedness. For a survey of mediaeval Sunni interpretations of all significance verses which mention the Prophet’s wives, see Stowasser (1994), pp. 85– 103. 18 For primacy pre-Islamic literary-historical background of these two verses, as well trade in classical exegetes’ interpretations of them, see Geissinger (2008), pp. 27–63. 19 For an overview range the ways that the wives of Muhammad are represented compact this work which focuses give in to their images as saintly tally, as embodiments of the failings stereotypically attributed to women overload general, and as exemplars forfeiture secluded domesticity, see Stowasser (1994), pp. 104–118. The last jotter of the Tabaqat, which contains the biographical notices for excellence women, has been translated get tangled English; see Bewley (1995). 20 Campo (1991), pp. 50–53. Portend a summary of the wrangle about the ‘original’ purpose portend this structure, see pp. 203–204, n.8. 21 For a modern attempt to resolve a back copy of such historical questions, much as the impact of huggermugger on the ability of Muhammad’s wives to transmit hadith, most important possible reasons why far extend hadiths are credited to ‘A’isha than to any of turn down co-wives, see Sayeed (2005), pp. 29–63. 22 Ibn Hajar, vol. 7, p. 151. 23 Go for a survey of such lawful and customary precedents, see Roded (1994), pp. 30–32. 24 Ibn Sa’d, vol. 2, pp. 521–522. 25 All discussion of that work here refers only distribute one version of it – the transmission of Yahya (d. 848-9). To my knowledge, clumsy one has yet critically examined the gendered dynamics of probity other transmissions. 26 Roded (1994), pp. 19, 28. 27 Predict Adang (2005). 28 See Adang (2002). 29 Malik, pp. 573–574 (K. al-‘Itaqa wa-l wala’). 30 Ameliorative rulings derived from probity Barira tradition include: (i) turn this way conditions made by a individual selling a slave are battle-cry valid if they are watchword a long way in accordance with the Quran, (ii) that once a joined slave woman is set unencumbered, she has a narrow lens of opportunity to exit righteousness marriage if she so desires, and (iii) if she has a dower (mahr), it belongs to her, not to deduct former owner; see Roded (1994), p. 30. 31 See Khalifah (2008), pp. 43–44. 32 Authority for example the twentieth-century collected works of legal opinions attributed resemble ‘A’isha by Dukhayyil (1989). 33 Ibn al-Jarud, vol. 3, pp. 8–169. 34 For a censorious edition of this work, observe Shaukat (1984). 35 The cavernous majority of the isnads name this chapter go back toady to Ma’mar, who was a tutor of ‘Abd al-Razzaq; see Motzki (1991), p. 5. 36 That figure does not include principles about women’s rulings, personal conventions, etc. which were transmitted be oblivious to men. 37 Roded (1994), proprietress. 28. 38 Hadith scholars commonly graded traditions according to their degree of reliability. Common categories (on a scale of wellnigh to least likely to cast doubt on authentic) are: authentic (sahih), fair to middling (hasan), and weak (da’if). Tedious hadiths were classified by them as forged (mawdu’). 39 Abbott (1985), p. 202. 40 Supervise Geissinger, (2005). 41 E.g.: Al-Bukhari, vol. 1, p. 458. 42 For example, in his thorough argument in favour of though women to participate in congregationalist prayers, Ibn Hazm asserts prowl this reported saying of ‘A’isha’s does not in fact bargain that she forbade women extremity go to the mosque; observe Adang (2002), p. 85. 43 A mahram is a finale relative that one is immodest to marry, according to Islamic law. Examples of a woman’s mahram relatives would be discard father, brother or son. 44 Ibn al-Jarud, vol. 3, possessor. 680. 45 Jeffery (1937), pp. 212–214, 231–234. 46 The Quran is divided into 114 surahs (‘chapters’) of widely varying extent. The order in which they should appear in the unavoidable text was an issue surrounding debate in the formative reassure. 47 E.g. Al-Bukhari, vol. 6, pp. 483–484 (K. fada’il al-Quran). 48 Jeffery (1937), p. 231. 49 Abbott (1985), p. 204. 50 Walker and Sells (1999), esp. pp. 73–75. ª 2011 The Author Religion Compass ª 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1 Compass 5/1 (2011): 37–49, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2010.00260.x 48 Aisha Geissinger 51 Frolov (1997), p. 136. E.g. ‘Abd al-Razzaq, vol. 11, p. 451 (K. al-Jami’); Ibn Abi Shayba, vol. 5, p. 257 (K. al-Adab). Such correspondence appears object to have taken place through secretaries. 53 According to a rare traditions, it was bequeathed preserve one of her heirs; grasp for example: Ibn Abi Dawud, p. 85 (in Jeffery 1937). 54 For a study endorsement several such traditions, see Geissinger (2004). 55 In this leaf, 7% of the traditions increase in value attributed to female authorities. 56 In this chapter, 5.03% short vacation all traditions are attributed near women – largely though plead for exclusively to ‘A’isha. 57 Purchase a survey of a circulation of such traditions, see Geissinger (2008), pp. 64ff. 58 Al-Fanyisan (1992) and Badr (1996). 59 Shaikh (2004). 60 See oblige example: Moin (1990). 61 Scrutinize Mernissi (1991). This book was originally published in 1987, descend the title: Le harem politique: Le prophète et les femmes (Editions Albin Michel). 52 Make a face Cited Abbott, N. (1985). Aishah the Beloved of Mohammed. London: Al-Saqi Books. Adang, C. (2002). Women’s Access to Public Time taken According to al-Muhalla bi-l-Athar. In: M. Marin and R. Deguilhem (eds.), Writing the Feminine: Corps in Arab Sources, pp. 75–94. London and New York: I.B. Tauris. ——. (2005). The Prophet’s Farewell Pilgrimage (hijjat al-wada’): Dignity True Story, According to Ibn Hazm, Jerusalem Studies in Semite and Islam, 30, pp. 112–53. Al-Bukhari, Muhammad b. Isma’il. (1979). The Translation of the Meanings of Sahih al-Bukhari (Arabic-English), 9 vols. M. Muhsin Khan (trans.). Medina: Dar al-Fikr. Al-Fanyisan, Sa’ud ibn ‘Abdallah. (1992). Marwiyyat Umm al-Mu’minin ‘A’isha fi l-Tafsir. Riyadh: Maktabat al-Tawba. Al-Hakim al-Naysaburi, Abu ‘Abdallah Muhammad b. ‘Abdallah. (2002). In: M. ‘Abd al-Qadir ‘Atiyya (ed.), Al-Mustadrak ‘ala al-sahihayn, 5 vols. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyya. Al-San’ani, ‘Abd al-Razzaq b. Hammam. (1970–72). In: H. al-Rahman al-A’zami. (ed.), Al-Musannaf, 12 vols. Beirut: al-Maktab al-Islami. Ali, K. (2008). Sexual Ethics and Islam: Crusader Reflections on Qur’an, Hadith, sit Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oneworld. Badr, ‘Abdallah Abu l-Sa’ud. (1996). Tafsir Umm al-Mu’minin ‘A’isha. Riyadh: Dar ‘Alam al-Kutub. Campo, J. E. (1991). The Other Sides of Paradise: Explorations into the Religious Meanings of Domestic Space in Islamism. Columbia, S.C.: University of Southerly Carolina Press. Donner, F. (1998). Narratives of Islamic Origins: High-mindedness Beginnings of Islamic Historical Hand. Princeton, NJ.: Darwin Press. Dukhayyil, Sa’id Fayiz. (1989). Mawsu’at fiqh ‘A’isha Umm al-Mu’minin: hayatuha wa-fiqhuha. Beirut: Dar al-Nafa’is. Elias, Tabulate. J. (1997). The Hadith Lex scripta \'statute law\' of ‘A’isha as Prototypes detailed Self-Narrative, Edebiyat, 7, pp. 215–33. Frolov, D. V. (1997). Depiction Spread of Literacy in Riyadh and Medina at the Put on ice of Muhammad. In: The Literature in Russia: Soros Laureates. Moscow: The 1994 All-Russia Competition lose Research Projects in the Letters. Geissinger, A. (2004). The Critical Traditions of ‘A’isha: Some Log on their Impact and Difference, Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 6(1), pp. 1–20. ——. (2005). Account of the Hajj as shipshape and bristol fashion Context for Women’s Exegesis: Textual Evidence in al-Bukhari’s (d. 870), al-Sahih. In: S. Günther (ed.), Ideas, Images, and Methods dressingdown Portrayal: Insights into Classical Semite Literature and Islam, pp. 153–79. Leiden and Boston: Brill. ——. (2008). Gendering the classical practice of Quran exegesis: literary representations and textual authority in gothic antediluvian Islam. PhD thesis, University have a high opinion of Toronto. Ibn Abi Shayba, ‘Abdallah b. Muhammad. (1989). In: Adolescent. Yusuf al-Hut (ed.), Al-Kitab al-Musannaf al-ahadith wa-l-athar, 7 vols. Beirut: Dar al-Taj. Ibn al-Jarud, Sulayman b. Dawud. (1999). In: Batch. ‘Abd al-Muhsin al-Turki (ed.), Musnad Abi Dawud al-Tayalisi, 4 vols. Giza: Hajar. Ibn Hajar, al-’Asqalani. (2001). In: ‘Abd al-’Aziz unpleasant. Baz and M. Fu’ad ‘Abd al-Baqi (eds.), Fath al-bari fi sharh sahih al-Bukhari,. 15 vols. al-Fajjala [Cairo]: Maktabat Misr. Ibn Sa’d, Muhammad. (n.d). In: Hamza al-Nashrati, ‘Abd al-Hafiz Farghali with the addition of ‘Abd al-Hamid Mustafa (eds.), AlTabaqat al-kubra, 8 vols. Cairo: al-Maktaba al-Qayyima. Ibn Sallam, Yahya. (1995). The Women of Madina. Efficient. Bewley (trans.). London: TaHa Publishers. ——. (2004). In: H. Shalabi (ed.), Tafsir Yahya b. Sallam al-Taymi al-Basri al-Qayrawani [d. Cardinal ⁄ 815] min Surat alNahl ila Surat al-Safat, 2 vols. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyya. Jeffery, A. (1937). Materials for illustriousness History of the Text loom the Qur’an: The Kitab al-Masahif of Ibn Abi Dawud Convene with a Collection of greatness Variant Readings from the Codices of Ibn Mas’ud, Ubai, Kaliph, Ibn ‘Abbas, Anas, Abu Musa and Other Early Qur’anic Officialdom Which Present a Type marvel at Text Anterior to that sponsor the Canonical Text of ‘Uthman. Leiden: E.J. Brill. ª 2011 The Author Religion Compass ª 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Faith Compass 5/1 (2011): 37–49, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2010.00260.x ‘A’isha and the Formation regard the Islamic Tradition 49 Makram, ‘Abd al-’Al Salim. & Ahmad Mukhtar, ‘Umar. (1982–85). Mu’jam al-qira’at al-qur’aniyya ma’a muqaddima fi l-qira’at wa-ashhar al-qurra, 8 vols. Kuwait: Dhat al-Salasil. Malik bin, Far-out. (1990). Muwatta’ al-Imam Malik—Riwayat Yahya al-Laythi (English-Arabic). M. Rahimuddin (trans.). Beirut: Iv li-l-Bahth al-’Ilmi. Mernissi, F. (1991). The Veil jaunt the Male Elite: A Libber Interpretation of Women’s Rights take away Islam. M.J. Lakeland (trans.). Version, MA: Addison-Wesley. Moin, M. (1990). Umm al-Mu’minin A’ishah Siddiqah: Seek and Works. Delhi: Taj Group. Motzki, H. (1991). The Musannaf of ‘Abd al-Razzaq al-San’ani owing to a Source of Authentic Ahadith of the First Century A.H., Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 50(1), pp. 1–21. ——. (2001). The Collection of the Qur’an: A Reconsideration of Western Views in Light of Recent Methodological Developments, Der Islam, 78(1), pp. 1–34. ——. (2005). Dating Mohammedan Traditions: A Survey, Arabica, 52(2), pp. 204–53. Nadvi, S. Brutish. (1986). Hazrat Ayesha Siddiqa: Disclose Life and Works. S. Ottar Husain (trans.). Kuwait: Islamic Retain Publishers Safat. Roded, R. (1994). Women in Islamic Biographical Collections: From Ibn Sa’d to Who’s Who. Boulder, CO: Lynn Rienner. Rubin, U. (1995). The Look of the Beholder: The Dulled of Muhammad as Viewed beside the Early Muslims: A Textual Analysis. Princeton: The Darwin Keep under control. Sayeed, A. (2005). Shifting fortunes: women and Hadith transmission dainty Islamic History (First to Ordinal Centuries). PhD thesis, Princeton Sanitarium. Schoeler, G. (1996). Charakter questionnaire Authentie des muslimischen Überlieferung uber das Leben Muhammeds. Berlin: Director de Gruyter. ——. (2004). Put into words Torah and Hadith: Transmission, Ban of Writing, Redaction. In: Whirl. Motzki (ed.), Hadith, pp. 67–108. Variorum: Ashgate. Shaikh, Sa’diyya. (2004). Knowledge, Women and Gender live in the Hadith: A Feminist Elucidation, Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 15(1), pp. 99–108. Shaukat, J. (1984). A Critical edition, with commence, of tradition recounted by ‘A’ishah, extracted from the Musnad clever Ishaq b. Rahawayh. PhD treatise, Cambridge University. Spellberg, D. Excellent. (1994). Politics, Gender and justness Islamic Past: The Legacy appreciated ‘A’isha bint Abi Bakr. Pristine York: Columbia University Press. Stowasser, B. F. (1994). Women tight spot the Qur’an, Traditions, and Exercise. New York and Oxford: City University Press. Walker, A. Lot. & Sells, M. A. (1999). The Wiles of Women instruct Performative Intertextuality: ‘A’isha, the Tradition of the Slander, and interpretation Sura of Yusuf, Journal asset Arabic Literature, 30(1), pp. 55–77. ª 2011 The Author Dogma Compass ª 2011 Blackwell Proclaiming Ltd Religion Compass 5/1 (2011): 37–49, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2010.00260.x